BN VERDICT – The reputation of Terry O’Connor

Terry O’Connor’s name is mud but we must be allowed to hear his point of view

THE final bell sounds and the winner – or who we believe to be the winner – celebrates. Far too often for the seasoned boxing fan, what comes next is a feeling of mild panic. Because we know there’s a chance the winner won’t actually be named the winner. It’s a sickener when those feelings of dread become reality. On Saturday night, we watched Mexico’s Miguel Vazquez (appear to) outbox Newcastle’s Lewis Ritson in Peterborough before two of the three judges scored the bout in Ritson’s favour. Michael Alexander favouring Ritson (115-113) was surprising but Terry O’Connor’s unfathomable score of 117-111 – nine rounds to three – for the home fighter not only cast a shadow over the bout but the whole event. That’s the power of incomprehensible cards: First, they rob a winner of victory and then they steal the attention away from those who really deserve it. That’s a crime. It has to stop.

The shadow got bigger and murkier when a screenshot emerged
of O’Connor looking at something in his hand, as opposed to the fight he was
being paid to judge. It looked like a mobile phone in the screenshot. Yet
looking closely at the footage, while inconclusive, one could reasonably
suggest it was clearly his notepad or scorecard he was looking at. Checking a notepad
or scorecard is better than looking at a phone but the crux, surely, is he was
not looking at the fight at all times. On several occasions in different rounds
he can be seen turning his attention from the fight to the object in question.
Each time it’s only a quick glance. But a quick glance is too long when the
decisions he’s making have a direct consequence on livelihoods and careers.

An eternal debate is the issue of point of view. Who really has the best view? Those who are privy to several angles and replays on a television or those who sit and watch from one side of the ring for the entirety of the bout? What we can’t deny is that they are very different views and experiences. I know being directly on the ring apron gives an immeasurably different perspective from watching at home and different, even, from watching a few rows back. However – and this is a big however – the argument that ringside judges have a better view than anyone becomes harder to spin if that view is impaired by looking away time and again.

I have always believed officials get a tough rap. Their job
is a thankless one. Get it right and they rarely get a pat on the back. Get it
right, in fact, and their performance goes unnoticed. Make a mistake and they’re
hung out to dry. But it’s getting harder to brush off controversy as simply a
matter of subjectivity, of ‘what you like’ when judging a fight.

This was not, as has been citied, the biggest robbery in
boxing history. There were several rounds when Ritson moved forwards trying to
force the action while Vazquez darted around the ring. But after watching twice,
I cannot come to any other conclusion than Vazquez was a comfortable winner. It’s
not the fact that O’Connor had Ritson winning that’s the worst thing here, it’s
that he could only give him three rounds out of 12. That simply has to be explained.

Robert Smith of the British Boxing Board of Control told Boxing
he was “very disappointed” to learn about the screenshot that showed O’Connor
with his attention elsewhere. An investigation will take place.

Smith has also told Boxing News in the past that those
investigations – which are frequent, by the way – must remain private and he
will not allow officials to speak publicly. That is understood. Yet there has to
be an argument that the enforced silence only hurts the reputation of the officials
in question and in turn the governing body that employs them. O’Connor is
perceived to have made countless mistakes in his officiating career yet not
once have we heard his point of view. Consequently, a bad reputation has snowballed.
The worst possible conclusions have been drawn.

For his own sake and for the good of the sport in this
country, his justification for this latest showing must be heard.

Source link

As an Editor and an Sports Geek, it's my pleasure to share my knowledge about Sports and their various aspects that can impact our lives.

Latest Posts

Facing Canelo – Callum Smith wanted the ultimate test. He got it

Now he must rebuild. Callum Smith speaks to...

Joseph Parker comes through heavyweight brawl with New Zealand rival Junior Fa

Joseph Parker gets the decision over old amateur...

Miami Vice: Canelo vs Yildirim

In his quest to become undisputed champion, boxing...

F1 revenues fell by $877 million in Covid-struck 2020 season · RaceFans

Formula 1 has reported revenues of $1.1 billion...

Canelo Alvarez: ‘I’m trying to make history’

At the final press conference Canelo Alvarez confirms...